galaxyBETA
explore
· ·
log in

log me in

log in forgot password

don't have an account?

sign up

preferences

theme picker site-wide filters

comments for Rock Always Wins Idle

sort: go back

Penguin777 November 20, 2024
+8comment score: 8

Title is wrong; I played rock and lost.

Acod verifier November 20, 2024
+5comment score: 5

the win/ties/losses display seems to have the numbers of ties and losses swapped around ^^

Biroulik November 20, 2024
+3comment score: 3

uhm, in the W/T/L stat under the streak, I think T and L are inverted compared to the score board provided

burgerboy1382 today
+3comment score: 3

Fun little game so far! My only gripe is that when I have a streak of zero, I still lose a mulligan on a loss. A fun way to fix this would be a "smart mulligan" upgrade. If I could enter a number, and it would reset instead of using the mulligan, I would end any bad luck runs early in the early game when it matters the most.

not_omen November 20, 2024
+2comment score: 2

Very interesting idea for a game

Mantus November 20, 2024
+1comment score: 1

Something's also off with the display of mulligans. I frequently see my number of mulligans go down by 2, and that shouldn't be possible.

Neffdigity today
+1comment score: 1

I prestiged and got all the way to the end, but it seems like it is impossible to get only rocks a second time. It still shows upgrades despite the fact that I got all of them. This is unlike rock, paper, and scissor upgrades, whose title disappears once you get all the upgrades for them. This would imply that either the game glitched, and didn't give me access to an upgrade it should have, or that the upgrade isn't added yet.

Biroulik today
+1comment score: 1

it seems like not only do well upgrades not have some special upgrade, it also doesn't have the switch upgrade, and even paper loses the switch upgrade when well is unlocked, which just feels strange, especially since scissors are the hardest to farm points for and not the other 2

Acod verifier November 20, 2024
0comment score: 0

agreed with mulligans being bugged, it seems that the outcome of choices affects the mulligans of other choices